Mathematics citation quotient

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Shahed University

Abstract

In today's fast-paced world, knowledge of various information sources and familiarity with electronic resources and their features is considered a crucial necessity for subject matter experts. The prominent characteristic of these information sources is the novelty of knowledge, the credibility of collected information, and awareness of the latest published research in emerging fields. Moreover, policymakers, planners, and research managers now more than ever prefer to make decisions based on solid scientific evidence. For instance, they aim to allocate more budget and research facilities to the most capable and deserving group of researchers and delegate more research tasks to them. After publication, they also evaluate and accredit the research based on achieving set objectives and even the impact it has on the scientific community. This article, using a review and library-based approach, focuses on introducing the American Mathematical Society (AMS) index and abstracts and the introduction of the Mathematics Citation Quotient (MCQ). Understanding these databases can be a guiding light for planners, research managers to achieve their desired objectives, and for bibliometric experts and information centers.

Keywords


[1] Specialized reference pamphlets accessible in ‎http://etelaaresanipirouz.blogfa.com/post/21
‎‎‎‎[2] ‎M. Thelwall, Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences, M. hasanzadeh, M.Hosseini and F. Navidi, Tehran: Ketabdar, 2009.
[3] V. P. Diodato, Dictionary of bibliometrics, Gh. heidari and R. Khademi, Tehran: Ketabdar, 2012.
[4] M. rasoulabadi, A. Khazari and F. Gharibi, Journal impact factor, Tehran: Shasoosa, 2011.
‎‎‎[5] Sh. Sadeghi Gouraji and  M. Sal Moslehian, Comparing MCQ with JIF2 and JIF5 for Mathematical Journals, Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Managemen, 29 (2013) 1175--1190.
[6] H. F. Moed, Citation analysis in research evaluation, A. Mirzaei and H. Mokhtari, Tehran: Chapar, 2007.
[7] A. Noroozi Chakoli and L. Samadi,  Electronic Special Indexes, The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Islamic Sciences and the Humanities (SAMT), 2007.
[8] A. Noroozi Chakoli, Introduction To Scientometric, The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Islamic Sciences and the Humanities (SAMT), 2004.
[9] 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification (2015), Retrieved from http://www.ams.org/msc/msc2010.html.
[10] P. Dubois, J. C. Rochet and J. M. Schlenker, Productivity and mobility in academic research: Evidence from mathematicians, Scientometrics, 98 no. 3 (2014) 1669–1701.
[11] J. Ewing, Measuring journals, NOTICES OF THE AMS, 53 no. 9 (2006) 1049–1053.
[12] S. Kutateladze, The game of cipher beads, J. Appl. Indust. Math., 3 no. 3 (2009) 364–366.
[13] Mathscinet, MR; Help, Retrieved 2014/12/29, from http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/help/citation_database_help_full.html#journallist.
[14] MathSciNet Guide: Author Citation and Journal Citation Searching, 2013, Retrieved 2015/01/10, from http://gethelp. library.upenn.edu/guides/scitech/databases/mathscinet/citationsearching.html.
[15] D. A. Pendlebury, The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 57 no.1 (2009) 1–11.
Volume 1, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
September 2016
Pages 31-37
  • Receive Date: 27 November 2014
  • Revise Date: 10 January 2015
  • Accept Date: 10 January 2015
  • Publish Date: 21 November 2016