Ring of continuous function in 1950s

Document Type : Translation Paper

Author

Shahid Chamran University

Abstract

This paper is a translation of the the following paper into Persian:
[Melvim Henriksen, Ring of Continuous Function in 1950s, Handbook of the History of General Topology, 1 (1997) 243-253.]
 

What follows is the authors recollection of the early development of rings of continuous functions with emphasis on the work done in the 1950s at Purdue University. No pretense is made of thoroughness or historical scholarship. Some of the work done since that time is discussed, and references to books and survey articles are included. The terminology used below is, by and large, that of the great text by L. Gillman and M. Jerison [L. Gillman and M. Jerison, Rings of continuous functions, D. Van Nostrand Publ. Co., New York, 1960]. In particular, for any topological space $X$$C(X)$ will denote the ring of all continuous functions $f:X\to \Bbb{R}$ under the usual pointwise operations, where $\Bbb{R}$ denotes the real field with its usual order and topology, and $C^*(X)$ denotes its subring of bounded continuous functions.

Keywords


[1] C. Aull (ed.), Rings of Continuous Functions, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, 1985.
[2] F. Anderson and R. Blair, A characterization of the algebra of all continuous functions on a completely regular space, Illinois J. Math., 3 (1959) 121-133.
[3] M. Antonovskij, D. Chudovsky, G. Chudovsky and E. Hewitt, Rings of real-valued continuous functions II, Math. Zeit., 176 (1981) 151-186.
[4] B. Banachewski, Local connectedness of extension spaces, Canad. J. Math., 8 (1956) 395-398.
[5] E. Beckenstein, L. Narici and C. Suffel, Topological Algebras, Mathematical Studies, 24 (1977), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.
[6] E. Čech, On bicompact spaces, Annals of Math., 38 (1937) 823-844.
[7] E. Correl and M. Henriksen, On rings of continuous functions with values in a division ring, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 7 (1956) 194-198.
[8] J. Dieudonné, Review of Rings of real-valued continuous functions I, Mathematical Reviews, 10 (1949) 126-127.
[9] A. Dow, On ultra powers of Boolean algebras, Topology Proceedings, 9 (1984) 269-291.
[10] E. van Douwen, Remote points, Diss. Math., 188 (1981) 1-45.
[11] P. Erdös, L. Gillman and M. Henriksen, An isomorphism theorem for real-closed fields, Annals of Math., 61 (1955) 542-544.
[12] L. Gillman, Rings of continuous functions are rings, Ordered Algebraic Structures, J. Martinez, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1985.
[13] I. Glicksberg, Stone-Čech compactifications of products, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 90 (1959) 369-382.
[14] L. Gillman and M. Henriksen, Concerning rings of continuous functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 77 (1954) 340-362.
[15] ———-, Rings of continuous functions in which every finitely generated ideal is principal, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 82 (1956) 366-391.
[16] L. Gillman, M. Henriksen and M. Jerison, On a theorem of Gelfand and Kolmogoroff concerning maximal ideals in rings of continuous functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 5 (1954) 447-455.
[17] L. Gillman and M. Jerison, Rings of continuous functions, D. Van Nostrand Publ. Co., New York, 1960.
[18] I. Gelfand and A. Kolmogoroff, On rings of continuous functions of a topological space, Doklady Akad. Nauk., 22 (1939) 11-15.
[19] M. Henriksen, On the ideal structure of the ring of entire functions, Pacific. J. Math., 2 (1952) 179-184.
[20] ———-, Rings of continuous functions from an algebraic point of view, Ordered Algebraic Structures, editor J. Martinez, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1989.
[21] E. Hewitt, Rings of real-valued continuous functions I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 64 (1948) 54-99.
[22] M. Henriksen and J. Isbell, On the continuity of the real roots of an algebraic equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 4 (1953) 431-434.
[23] ———-, On the stone-Čech compactification of the product of two spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 63 (1957) 145-146.
[24] ———-, Local connectedness in the stone-Čech compactification, Illinois J. Math., 1 (1957) 574-582.