[1] L. T. Adison and U. Bronfenbrenner, Human echology, 20 (1992) 16–20.
[2] P. D. Bayliss, A curriculum for inclusion, Curriculum, 18 (1997) 15–27.
[3] Ph. Bayliss, Towards inclusive education, Lecture Notes, University of Exeter, UK, 2003.
[4] C. Benn and B. Simon, Half way there, report on the british comprehensive school reform, McGraw-Hill, 1970.
[5] P. Berger and Th. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor, 1967.
[6] R. Bogdan, “Does mainstreaming work” is a silly question, Phi Delta Kappan, 64 (1983) 427–428.
[7] U. Bronfenbrenner, The ecology of euman development: experiments by nature and design, Harvard University Press, 1981.
[8] S. J. Ceci, Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917–2005), American Psychologist, 61 (2006) 173–174.
[9] H. Collins, Social construction of reality, Humanistic Studies, 39 (2016) 161–165.
[10] I. Darke, A review of research related to the topological primacy thesis, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13 no. 2 (1982) 119–142.
[11] K. Dorrani, The sociology of educational institution, University of Tehran Press, (2022). [In Persian]
[12] E. Dubinsky and R. P. Moses, Philosophy, Math Research, Math Ed Research, K-16 Education, and the Civil Rights Movement: A Synthesis, Notices of the AMS, 58 no. 3 (2011) 401–409.
[13] O. D̄okić and M. Vorkapić, The conceptual change approach in mathematics education: From topological primacy to projective geometry, Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics; Eötvös Loránd, University of Budapest Budapest, Hungary, (2023) 11 pp.
[14] E. Dubinsky, Actions, processes, objects, schemas (APOS) in mathematics education, In S. Lerman (ed.), Ency. of Math. Edu., (2014) 8–11.
[15] C. S. Dweck, The power of believing that you can improve, TED Talk, (2014). https://www.ted.com/talks/carol_dweck_the_power_of_believing_that_you_can_improve.
[16] M. A. Eslami Nodoshan, Iran and its loneliness, Enteshar Co. Publisher, (2024). [In Persian]
[17] L. Florian, Inclusive practice: what, why, and how?, In L. Florian, R. Rose, and C. Tilston (Eds.), Promoting Inclusive Practice, Routledge, (2016) 13–26.
[18] S. Goodchild, Rationals, Purposes and meta concepts in mathematical activity, Philosophy of Mathematics Education Newsletter, 9 (1996).
[19] F. Ghasemlou, B. Manouchehian, Documenting the Contemporary History of Iranian Mathematics, 1 to 4, Sabzahang, (2021). [In Persian]
[20] H. Harouni, Art and anti-mathematics, In B. Greer, D. Kollosche, and O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Breaking Images: Iconoclastic Analyses of Mathematics and its Education, Open Book Publishers, (2024) 269–290.
[21] S. Haghjoo, E. Reyhani, Investigating the Frameworks of Students’ Understanding of the relationship between the Derivative and Antiderivative Function graphs: A Qualitative Meta-analysis, New Educational Approaches, 17 no. 1 (2022) 59–84. [In Persian]
[22] E. Hidayat and J. Suoranta, The past, present and future of the comprehensive school reform in finland: from planning to marketization?, Foro de Educación, 20 no. 2 (2022) 255–274.
[23] C. M. Hoxby, The economics of school reform, National Bureau of Economic Research, (1998). https://www.nber.org/reporter/spring-1998/economics-school-reform.
[24] T. Iljazi, Creativity in Teaching Mathematics, Journal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics of UT, 8 (2023) 419–424.
[25] F. Kemmerer and A. P. Wagner, The economics of educational reform, Economics of Education Review, 4 no. 3 (1985) 111–121.
[26] A. N. Khuziakhmetov and P. M. Gorev, Introducing learning creative mathematical activity for students in extra mathematics teaching, Bolema, Rio Claro (SP), 31 no. 58 (2017) 642–658.
[27] M. E. Koltko-Rivera, Rediscovering the later version of maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence andopportunities for theory, research, and unification, Review of General Psychology, 10 no. 4 (2006) 302–317.
[28] N. Kunc, The need to belong: rediscovering Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, In: R. A. Villa, J. S. Thousands, W. Stainback, and S. Stainback, Restructuring for Caring & Effective Education, (1992) 25–40.
[29] R. M. Learner and C. D. Ryff, Implementation of the life-span view of human development: the sample case of attachment, In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), Life-Span Development and Behavior, Academic Press, 1 (1978) 2–39.
[30] A. Lewis, Children’s understanding of disability, Routledge, 2002.
[31] M. Leicester and D. Taylor, Critical thinking across the curriculum: developing critical thinking skills, literacy and philosophy in the primary classroom, Open University Press, 2010.
[32] F. Luthans, Organizational behavior, 12th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2011.
[33] F. C. Lunenburg, The Principal and the School: What Do Principals Do?, National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27 no. 4 (2010) 1–13.
[34] D. R. Mitchel (Ed.), Special educational needs and inclusive education: major themes in education, Routledge,
2004.
[35] D. E. Mithaung, The alternative to ideological inclusion, In S. J. Vitello and D. E. Mithaung, Inclusive Schooling: National and International Prespectives, Lawrence Erlbam, (2010) 1–23.
[36] H. Murray, A. Olivier and P. Human, The dvelopment of young students’ division strategies, In W. Geeslin and K. Graham (Ed.), Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. for the Psychology of Mathematics Instruction, 2 (1992) 152–159.
[37] B. Manouchehian, Contemporary Iranian Mathematics and the Rise of the First Steps, Daneshgah-e-Enghelab, 104 (1994) 79–88. [In Persian]
[38] H. Mirmotahari, A tribute to Mohammad Vahid Tonekabani, an exemplary teacher and scholar, on the fiftieth anniversary of the publication of an exemplary book, Journal o Education and Training, (1971) 325–331. [In Persian]
[39] M. Nind, What about development and developmental approach?, Conf. of British Edu. Res. Ass. (CBERA), Cardiff, September 2000.
[40] B. Norwich, Education, inclusion and individual differences: recognising and resolving dilemas, British Journal of Education Studies, 50 no. 4 (2002) 482–502.
[41] W. R. Orton, School mathematics in iran, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 12 no. 4 (1981) 473–479.
[42] M. Pasandideh, Mathematics in Dar-al-Fonoon, Qajar Era, Postgraduate Dissertation, University of Tehran, (2007). [In Persian]
[43] J. Piaget and B. Inhelder, The child’s conception of space, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956.
[44] J. Piaget, Studies in reflecting abstraction, Psychology Press, 2000.
[45] C. Presicce, R. Jain, C. Rodeghiero, L. E. Gabaree, and N. Rusk, We scratch: an inclusive, playful and collaborative approach to creative learning online, Information and Learning Sciences, (2020) 2398–5348.
[46] W. V. Quine and J. S. Ullian, The web of belief, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1978.
[47] E. Reyhani Z. Sharifi, Investigation of the conception of third-grade female high school students of the concept of limit and continuity, Educational Technoloy, 12 no. 4 (2018) 273–290. [In Persian]
[48] G. R. Rokni Lamouki, Education for the sustainable development: understanding the efficiency and reliability of technology in the shadow of education, Nāme-ye-Oloom-e Pāye (Quarterly Review of Basic Sciences), 2 no. 5 (2022) 21–29. [In Persian]
[49] G. R. Rokni Lamouki, An experience teaching mathematics to biology students, Iranian Journal of Biology, 6 no. 11 (2022) 26–41. [In Persian]
[50] N. Sajadieh, Genology and Education, University of Tehran Press, (2022). [In Persian]
[51] W. Schipper, The topological primacy thesis: genetic and didactic aspects, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14 no. 3 (1983) 285–296.
[52] C. N. Shealy, Making sense of beliefs and values: theory, research, and practice, Springer, 2015.
[53] SchratchED, Creative ways to teach math using Scratch, 2024 at https://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/discussions/teaching-scratch/creative-ways-teach-math-using-scratch.html.
[54] L. Shelton, The bronfenbrenner primer: a guide to develecology, Routledge, 2018.
[55] B. R. Simmons and P. D. Bayliss, The role of special schools for children with profound and multiple learning difficulties: is segregation always best?, British Journal of Special Education, 34 no. 1 (2007) 19–24.
[56] R. E. Slavin, Educational psychology: theory and practice, 12th ed., Pearson, 2018.
[57] J. Snowman and R. F. Biehler, Psychology applied to teaching, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2003.
[58] B. Sriraman, Tall and goodchild: in memoriam David Tall (1941-2024) & Simon Goodchild (1950-2024), The Mathematics Enthusiast, 22 no. 3 (2025) 182–184.
[59] L. Streefland, Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education as a theoretical source for psychology. Fractions as a paradigm, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1 no. 2 (1986) 67–82.
[60] S. J. Tabatabaei, Reflections on Iran, Volume Two, Part One, Tabriz School and the Foundations of Renewal, Minoy-e-Kherad, (2020). [In Persian]
[61] C. Tilston, Moving towards the mainstream: vision and reality, in L. Florian and R. Rose, Promoting Inclusive Practice, Routledge, 1998.
[62] A. Treffers and F. Goffree, Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education — the wiskobas program, In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Utrecht: State University, 2 (1985) 97–123.
[63] S. Vosoughi and G. R. Rokni Lamouki, A look at the motivation of Iranian academics to enter the world of basic sciences, Nāme-ye-Oloom-e Pāye (Quarterly Review of Basic Sciences), 2 no. 7& 8 (2023) 59-72. [In Persian]
)