Montessori method as a basis for integrated mathematics learning

Document Type : Translation Paper

Authors

Faculty of Science, Mahalat Higher Education Center, Mahalat, Iran

Abstract

This paper is a translation of the the following paper into Persian:
[J. Milinkovic and D. Bogavac, Montessori method as a basis for integrated mathematics learning, Metodicki obzori, 11 (2011) 135-142.]
 
 This research offers a theoretical comparative analysis of the Montessori Method and integrative teaching. Current trends call for incorporation of an integrative approach into educational practice. From the constructivists’ cognitive perspective knowledge is constantly changing, and results from acting and thinking. Maria Montessori developed an
approach which is intellectually challenging and motivating. It develops a creative, flexible, authentic and constructive personality. In this paper we focus on theoretical aspects of both Montessori Method and integrative approach and look for compatible elements. We pay special attention to effects of the Montessori Method on development of mathematical aspects of reasoning.


Our argument is that preschool Montessori Method has the capacity to become the basis for an integrative school approach. This provides a smooth move from early childhood learning to school learning. We point to the similarity of learning goals. Also, we pay attention to features of productive environments created within these two Methods for mathematics learning. In the light of the analysis, we suggest common features of the Montessori Method and integrated curriculum approach which have positive effects on mathematics learning. Finally, we draw some educational and curricular research questions. Our argument is that the Montessori Method presents natural prerequisites for integrated learning. We conclude that together they fulfil the social need for functional knowledge and holistic approach to a child’s development.

 
 

Keywords


[1] P. A. House and A. F. Coxford, Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum, Yearbook, NCTM, 1995.
[2] B. Isaacs, Bringing the Montessori approach to your Early Years Practice, Rootled, London, 2007.
[3] A. Kozulin, Vygotsky in context. In L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and language, pp. xi-lvi, The Massachusetts Institute of Tech-nology, 1986.
[4] A. N. Leontiev, Problems of the development of the mind, Moscow: Progress, 1981.
[5] F. L. Loepp, Models of curriculum integration, Journal of Technology Studies, 25 (1999) 21–25.
[6] S. A. McGraw, Integrated Mathematics: Choices and Challenges, NCTM: Reston, VA 2003.
[7] J. Milinkovic, Pupils’ active learning in integrated mathematics and technical education class: a case study. In I. Radovanovic
and Z. Zaclona (Eds) Student in Contemporary Learning and Teaching, 97-109. Uciteljski fakultet, Beograd, 2009.
[8] Ministry for Education and Sport of Republic of Serbia, The foundation of school curriculum, 2003.
[9] T. A. Romberg, Mathematics in context: a connected curriculum for Grades 5–8, Encyclopedia Britanica, 1998.
[10] E. Terhart, Metode poucavanja i ucenja: uvod u problem metodicke organizacije poucavanjai ucenja. Zagreb: Educa, 2001.
[11] J. Tudge and B. Rogoff, Influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian Perspectives. In M. H. Bornstein J. S. Bruner (Eds.) Interaction in Human development, 17–39. Hillsdalle, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1989.
[12] J. Van Haneghan, L. Barron, M. Young and N. V. Williams, The Jasper Series: An experiment with new ways to enhance mathematical thinking. In D. F. Halpern (ed) Enhancing thinking skills in the sciences and mathematics, 1992.
[13] L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and language. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
[14] J. V. Wertsch, Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, New York: Cambridge University Press, (1985) 1–18.
[15] N. Vilotijevic, Integrativna nastava prirode i drustva. Beograd: Školska knjiga, 2006.
[16] N. Vilotijevic, Sistemsko-teorijske osnove integrativne nastave. Metodicka praksa, Beograd, Uciteljski fakultet, 4 (2008) 79–96.