بررسی نظری آموزش ‌ریاضی ایران

[1] L. T. Adison and U. Bronfenbrenner, Human echology, 20 (1992) 16–20.
[2] P. D. Bayliss, A curriculum for inclusion, Curriculum, 18 (1997) 15–27.
[3] Ph. Bayliss, Towards inclusive education, Lecture Notes, University of Exeter, UK, 2003.
[4] C. Benn and B. Simon, Half way there, report on the british comprehensive school reform, McGraw-Hill, 1970.
[5] P. Berger and Th. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor , 1967.
[6] R. Bogdan, “Does mainstreaming work” is a silly question, Phi Delta Kappan, 64 (1983) 427–428.
[7] U. Bronfenbrenner, The ecology of euman development: experiments by nature and design, Harvard University Press, 1981.
[8] S. J. Ceci, Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917–2005), American Psychologist, 61 (2006) 173–174.
[9] H. Collins, Social construction of reality, Humanistic Studies, 39 (2016) 161–165.
[10] I. Darke, A review of research related to the topological primacy thesis, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13 no. 2 (1982) 119–142.
[11] O. Đokić and M. Vorkapić, The conceptual change approach in mathematics education: From topological primacy to projective geometry, Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics; Eötvös Loránd, University of Budapest Budapest, Hungary, (2023) 11 pp.
[12] E. Dubinsky, Actions, processes, objects, schemas (APOS) in mathematics education, In S. Lerman (ed.), Ency. of Math. Edu., (2014) 8–11.
[13] C. S. Dweck, The power of believing that you can improve, TED Talk, (2014). https://www.ted.com/talks/carol_dweck_the_power_of_believing_that_you_can_improve.
[14] L. Florian, Inclusive practice: what, why, and how?, In L. Florian, R. Rose, and C. Tilston (Eds.), Promoting Inclusive Practice, Routledge, (2016) 13–26.
[15] S. Goodchild, Rationals, Purposes and meta concepts in mathematical activity, Philosophy of Mathematics Education Newsletter, 9 (1996).
[16] H. Harouni, Art and anti-mathematics, In B. Greer, D. Kollosche, and O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Breaking Images: Iconoclastic Analyses of Mathematics and its Education, Open Book Publishers, (2024) 269–290.
[17] E. Hidayat and J. Suoranta, The past, present and future of the comprehensive school reform in finland: from planning to marketization?, Foro de Educación, 20 no. 2 (2022) 255–274.
[18] C. M. Hoxby, The economics of school reform, National Bureau of Economic Research, (1998). https://www.nber.org/reporter/spring-1998/economics-school-reform.

[19] T. Iljazi, Creativity in Teaching Mathematics, Journal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics of UT, 8 (2023) 419–424.
[20] F. Kemmerer and A. P. Wagner, The economics of educational reform, Economics of Education Review, 4 no. 3 (1985) 111–121.
[21] A. N. Khuziakhmetov and P. M. Gorev, Introducing learning creative mathematical activity for students in extra mathematics teaching, Bolema, Rio Claro (SP), 31 no. 58 (2017) 642–658.
[22] M. E. Koltko-Rivera, Rediscovering the later version of maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification, Review of General Psychology, 10 no. 4 (2006) 302–317.
[23] N. Kunc, The need to belong: rediscovering Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, In: R. A. Villa, J. S. Thousands, W. Stainback, and S. Stainback, Restructuring for Caring & Effective Education, (1992) 25–40.
[24] R. M. Learner and C. D. Ryff, Implementation of the life-span view of human development: the sample case of attachment, In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), Life-Span Development and Behavior, Academic Press, 1 (1978) 2–39.
[25] A. Lewis, Children’s understanding of disability, Routledge, 2002.
[26] M. Leicester and D. Taylor, Critical thinking across the curriculum: developing critical thinking skills, literacy and philosophy in the primary classroom, Open University Press, 2010.
[27] F. Luthans, Organizational behavior, 12th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2011.
[28] F. C. Lunenburg, The Principal and the School: What Do Principals Do?, National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27 no. 4 (2010) 1–13.
[29] D. R. Mitchel (Ed.), Special educational needs and inclusive education: major themes in education, Routledge, 2004.
[30] D. E. Mithaung, The alternative to ideological inclusion, In S. J. Vitello and D. E. Mithaung, Inclusive Schooling: National and International Prespectives, Lawrence Erlbam, (2010) 1–23.
[31] H. Murray, A. Olivier and P. Human, The dvelopment of young students’ division strategies, In W. Geeslin and K. Graham (Ed.), Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. for the Psychology of Mathematics Instruction, 2 (1992) 152–159.
[32] M. Nind, What about development and developmental approach?, Conf. of British Edu. Res. Ass. (CBERA), Cardiff, September 2000.
[33] B. Norwich, Education, inclusion and individual differences: recognising and resolving dilemas, British Journal of Education Studies, 50 no. 4 (2002) 482–502.
[34] W. R. Orton, School mathematics in iran, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 12 no. 4 (1981) 473–479.
[35] J. Piaget and B. Inhelder, The child’s conception of space, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956.
[36] J. Piaget, Studies in reflecting abstraction, Psychology Press, 2000.
[37] C. Presicce, R. Jain, C. Rodeghiero, L. E. Gabaree, and N. Rusk, We scratch: an inclusive, playful and collaborative approach to creative learning online, Information and Learning Sciences, (2020) 2398–5348.
[38] W. V. Quine and J. S. Ullian, The web of belief, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1978.

[39] J. Snowman and R. F. Biehler, Psychology applied to teaching, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2003. [40] W. Schipper, The topological primacy thesis: genetic and didactic aspects, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14 no. 3 (1983) 285–296.
[41] C. N. Shealy, Making sense of beliefs and values: theory, research, and practice, Springer, 2015.
[42] SchratchED, Creative ways to teach math using Scratch, 2024 at https://scratched.gse.harvard. edu/discussions/teaching-scratch/creative-ways-teach-math-using-scratch.html.
[43] L. Shelton, The bronfenbrenner primer: a guide to develecology, Routledge, 2018.
[44] B. R. Simmons and P. D. Bayliss, The role of special schools for children with profound and multiple learning difficulties: is segregation always best?, British Journal of Special Education, 34 no. 1 (2007) 19–24.
[45] R. E. Slavin, Educational psychology: theory and practice, 12th ed., Pearson, 2018.
[46] B. Sriraman, Tall and goodchild: in memoriam David Tall (1941-2024) & Simon Goodchild (1950-2024), The Mathematics Enthusiast, 22 no. 3 (2025) 182–184.
[47] L. Streefland, Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education as a theoretical source for psychology. Fractions as a paradigm, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1 no. 2 (1986) 67–82.
[48] C. Tilston, Moving towards the mainstream: vision and reality, in L. Florian and R. Rose, Promoting Inclusive Practice, Routledge, 1998.
[49] A. Treffers and F. Goffree, Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education — the wiskobas program, In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Utrecht: State University, 2 (1985) 97–123.